This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Updated August 27, 2026.

TL;DR: There is no single framework that should own an entire LLM application. A practical stack usually combines an orchestration or agent runtime, retrieval and storage, a model gateway or inference server, and observability and evaluation. Choose the smallest set of layers that solves your actual bottlenecks.

How to read this list

These tools are not ten interchangeable “LLM frameworks.” They solve different jobs. Some orchestrate agents, some connect models to private data, some serve open models, and others monitor or evaluate systems in production. Nine entries have permissively licensed open-source cores. Dify uses a modified Apache 2.0 license, so it is more accurately described as source-available.

10 tools for building LLM applications in 2026

1. LangChain and LangGraph — agent orchestration

LangChain 1.x is now centered on the core agent loop rather than the broad collection of chains associated with its early releases. Its standard create_agent API runs on the LangGraph 1.x runtime, while middleware controls prompts, tool access, state, guardrails and human approval.

Choose it when: you need broad model and tool integrations, durable state, streaming, human-in-the-loop steps or a custom graph-shaped workflow. Teams still using older AgentExecutor patterns should follow the current migration guidance instead of starting new work on the legacy API.

2. Microsoft Agent Framework — enterprise agent runtime

Microsoft Agent Framework is Microsoft’s direct successor to Semantic Kernel and AutoGen for new agent projects. It combines agent abstractions, graph-based workflows, multi-agent orchestration, telemetry and enterprise integration in Python and .NET. AutoGen is in maintenance mode, while Semantic Kernel continues to receive fixes and remains usable for existing applications.

Choose it when: your team is already in the Microsoft ecosystem or needs explicit workflows, provider flexibility and enterprise controls. For a new 2026 project, start with Agent Framework rather than presenting Semantic Kernel or AutoGen as Microsoft’s primary direction.

3. LlamaIndex — data and retrieval

LlamaIndex focuses on connecting models and agents to private or domain-specific data. Its open-source framework covers ingestion, indexing, retrieval, query engines and data-aware workflows, with a large connector ecosystem.

Choose it when: document ingestion, retrieval quality and data-heavy RAG are the center of the application. It can work on its own or provide retrieval tools to an agent built with LangGraph or another runtime.

4. Haystack 3 — agents and production RAG

Haystack 3.0, released July 20, 2026, moves agents to the center of the framework. It adds first-class skills, hooks around the agent loop, run introspection, async support and a lighter core while retaining modular components for retrieval and generation.

Choose it when: you want readable, testable components for production agents and RAG. Haystack 2.31 receives only security patches and critical bug fixes through the end of October 2026, so new projects should target 3.x.

5. Weaviate — vector storage and retrieval

Weaviate is the storage layer in this list: an open-source vector database for semantic and hybrid search, metadata filtering and retrieval at scale. It can be self-hosted or consumed as a managed service.

Choose it when: vectors, objects, filters and retrieval need to live in a dedicated database rather than inside an application framework. LlamaIndex, Haystack and LangChain can all sit above it.

6. LiteLLM — model gateway

LiteLLM exposes many hosted and local model providers behind an OpenAI-compatible interface. Its proxy adds routing, fallbacks, budgets, rate limits and usage tracking without forcing the rest of the application to depend on one provider’s SDK.

Choose it when: provider portability, centralized credentials, cost controls and failover are more important than adding another orchestration abstraction.

7. vLLM — high-throughput model serving

vLLM is primarily an inference engine and OpenAI-compatible server for serving open models efficiently. Calling it merely a Python framework misses the way most teams deploy it: as infrastructure behind an API.

Choose it when: you operate model weights and need throughput, batching and an interface compatible with existing OpenAI clients. SGLang is the important alternative to evaluate for serving, structured generation and increasingly sophisticated routing.

8. Langfuse — observability and prompt operations

Langfuse provides tracing, prompt management, datasets, experiments and evaluations for LLM and agent applications. The product core is MIT-licensed and can be self-hosted without usage limits; optional enterprise security and administration modules require a commercial license.

Choose it when: you need to understand latency, cost, tool calls, failures and quality across development and production. It complements an orchestration framework rather than replacing one.

9. Ragas — evaluation

Ragas is an open-source evaluation framework for RAG systems and agents. It helps teams build datasets, define metrics and run repeatable experiments instead of relying on a handful of manually inspected outputs.

Choose it when: retrieval quality, groundedness, task completion or regression testing must be measured before and after changes. Pair it with production traces from Langfuse or another observability layer.

10. Dify — source-available visual application platform

Dify combines visual workflows, agents, RAG, model integrations and deployment in one collaborative platform. It is convenient for teams that want to move from prototype to a deployed internal application without assembling every layer themselves.

License note: Dify is source-available under a modified Apache 2.0 license. Running a multi-tenant service requires written authorization, and its frontend logo and copyright information cannot be removed or modified. Check the license before using it in a commercial hosted product.

Where MCP fits

Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a protocol, not another all-purpose framework. It standardizes how applications connect models and agents to tools, resources and external data. In 2026, MCP support is a practical selection criterion for agent runtimes, visual builders and gateways because it reduces the amount of one-off integration code.

Useful complements that are not part of the ten

DSPy is useful for programmatic optimization of LM programs, while Instructor focuses on validated structured outputs. Gradio remains a fast way to build interfaces and demos. Flowise is now a broader node-based visual platform for agents and LLM workflows, not simply a LangChainJS UI.

Helicone is an observability platform and AI gateway with a proxy-first integration, not a framework for “querying GPT models.” Superagent now focuses on agent safety, including prompt-injection detection, redaction and runtime protection. Chainlit can still accelerate conversational interfaces, but it has been community-maintained since May 2025 and carries no warranty of future updates from the original company.

How to choose a stack

  • Agent runtime: LangChain with LangGraph, or Microsoft Agent Framework.

  • RAG and private data: LlamaIndex or Haystack, with Weaviate when you need a dedicated vector database. If retrieval is the hard part, compare the 10 RAG frameworks for 2026 before choosing a layer here.

  • Provider routing: LiteLLM.

  • Self-hosted inference: vLLM, while benchmarking SGLang for your models and hardware.

  • Observability and evaluation: Langfuse plus Ragas.

  • Visual application building: Dify, after reviewing its license; Flowise is an open-source alternative worth comparing.

The durable principle is to keep layers replaceable. Test with realistic data, inspect licenses before deployment, and add orchestration only where it makes the system easier to operate.

FAQ

What is the best open-source framework for building LLM applications?

There is no universal best choice. LangChain with LangGraph is a strong general-purpose agent stack, LlamaIndex is data-first, and Haystack 3 emphasizes production agents and RAG. Choose according to the hardest layer in your application.

What is the difference between LangChain and LlamaIndex?

LangChain and LangGraph focus on orchestrating models, tools, state and agent workflows. LlamaIndex focuses on ingesting, indexing and retrieving private data. They can be used together, with LlamaIndex providing retrieval to a LangGraph agent.

What is the best open-source framework for AI agents?

LangChain with LangGraph is broadly useful across Python and TypeScript. Microsoft Agent Framework is a strong option for Python or .NET teams that need explicit workflows and enterprise integration. Haystack 3 is attractive when agents and retrieval must share a modular production architecture.

What does MCP do in an LLM application?

MCP standardizes connections between an LLM application and external tools, resources and data sources. It reduces custom integration work, but it does not replace an agent runtime, model gateway, database or evaluation framework.

Can Dify be used commercially?

Yes, but its modified Apache 2.0 license adds conditions. A commercial license or written authorization is required for multi-tenant operation, and Dify’s frontend logo and copyright information cannot be removed or modified. Review the current license for your deployment model.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading

View more
caret-right